China vs Slovenia: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
China
20,971 Index
in 2024
Slovenia
14.79 Index
in 2025
China rank
3rd
Slovenia rank
3rd
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time
- China
- Slovenia
How they compare
China currently reports 20,971 Index against 14.79 Index in Slovenia, a difference of 20,956 Index.
That makes China's figure about 1,417.9 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Slovenia ahead.
China ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 3rd of 136 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 434.45 Index | 0 Index | 434.45 Index | China |
| 2000s | 1,603 Index | 0 Index | 1,603 Index | China |
| 2010s | 6,739 Index | 15.54 Index | 6,723 Index | China |
| 2020s | 17,517 Index | 13.22 Index | 17,504 Index | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, China or Slovenia?
- China, at 20,971 Index against 14.79 Index in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between China and Slovenia?
- 20,956 Index, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Slovenia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Slovenia rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
- China ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 3rd of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.