China vs Korea: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal

China
20,971 Index
in 2024
Korea
0 Index
in 2025
China rank
3rd
Korea rank
6th

IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time

  • China
  • Korea
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197119982025

How they compare

China currently reports 20,971 Index against 0 Index in Korea, a difference of 20,971 Index.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Korea ahead.

China ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 6th of 136 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Korea Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Index 0 Index 0 Index
1980s 0 Index 0 Index 0 Index
1990s 434.45 Index 0 Index 434.45 Index China
2000s 1,603 Index 5.95 Index 1,597 Index China
2010s 6,739 Index 0 Index 6,739 Index China
2020s 17,517 Index 0 Index 17,517 Index China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, China or Korea?
China, at 20,971 Index against 0 Index in Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between China and Korea?
20,971 Index, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Korea?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do China and Korea rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
China ranks 3rd and Korea ranks 6th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Korea: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ipac-dashboard-indicators-geothermal/china/korea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ipac-dashboard-indicators-geothermal/china/korea/">China vs Korea: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
161 places, 8,280 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed