China vs Ethiopia: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal

China
20,971 Index
in 2024
Ethiopia
0 Index
in 2024
China rank
3rd
Ethiopia rank
4th

IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time

  • China
  • Ethiopia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197119972024

How they compare

China currently reports 20,971 Index against 0 Index in Ethiopia, a difference of 20,971 Index.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Ethiopia ahead.

China ranks 3rd and Ethiopia ranks 4th of 136 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 Index 0 Index 0 Index —
1980s 0 Index 0 Index 0 Index —
1990s 434.45 Index 3.96 Index 430.5 Index China
2000s 1,603 Index 3.78 Index 1,599 Index China
2010s 6,739 Index 2.24 Index 6,737 Index China
2020s 17,517 Index 0 Index 17,517 Index China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, China or Ethiopia?
China, at 20,971 Index against 0 Index in Ethiopia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between China and Ethiopia?
20,971 Index, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ethiopia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do China and Ethiopia rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
China ranks 3rd and Ethiopia ranks 4th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ethiopia: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ipac-dashboard-indicators-geothermal/china/ethiopia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/ipac-dashboard-indicators-geothermal/china/ethiopia-2/">China vs Ethiopia: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
Unit
Index
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
161 places, 8,280 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed