China vs Croatia: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
China
20,971 Index
in 2024
Croatia
6.21 Index
in 2025
China rank
3rd
Croatia rank
5th
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time
- China
- Croatia
How they compare
China currently reports 20,971 Index against 6.21 Index in Croatia, a difference of 20,965 Index.
That makes China's figure about 3,379.7 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Croatia ahead.
China ranks 3rd and Croatia ranks 5th of 136 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 434.45 Index | 0 Index | 434.45 Index | China |
| 2000s | 1,603 Index | 0.9698 Index | 1,602 Index | China |
| 2010s | 6,739 Index | 11.72 Index | 6,727 Index | China |
| 2020s | 17,517 Index | 33.68 Index | 17,483 Index | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, China or Croatia?
- China, at 20,971 Index against 6.21 Index in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between China and Croatia?
- 20,965 Index, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Croatia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Croatia rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
- China ranks 3rd and Croatia ranks 5th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.