Belgium vs North Macedonia: IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal
Belgium
6.21 Index
in 2025
North Macedonia
4.12 Index
in 2025
Belgium rank
29th
North Macedonia rank
30th
IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal over time
- Belgium
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 6.21 Index against 4.12 Index in North Macedonia, a difference of 2.09 Index.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.5 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 29th and North Macedonia ranks 30th of 136 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.75 Index | 9.65 Index | 6.9 Index | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 3.23 Index | 12.55 Index | 9.32 Index | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 2.78 Index | 7.6 Index | 4.82 Index | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 4.39 Index | 4.4 Index | 0.0095 Index | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal, Belgium or North Macedonia?
- Belgium, at 6.21 Index against 4.12 Index in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal between Belgium and North Macedonia?
- 2.09 Index, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and North Macedonia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and North Macedonia rank globally for ipac dashboard indicators — geothermal?
- Belgium ranks 29th and North Macedonia ranks 30th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as IPAC Dashboard indicators — Geothermal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.