Eswatini vs Gambia: Institutionalized democracy
Institutionalized democracy over time
- Eswatini
- Gambia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 against 0 in Gambia, a difference of 0.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 41st and Gambia ranks 41st of 51 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3 | 8 | 5 | Gambia |
| 1970s | 0.9 | 8 | 7.1 | Gambia |
| 1980s | 0 | 7.1 | 7.1 | Gambia |
| 1990s | 0 | 3.2 | 3.2 | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher institutionalized democracy, Eswatini or Gambia?
- Eswatini, at 0 against 0 in Gambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in institutionalized democracy between Eswatini and Gambia?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for institutionalized democracy?
- Eswatini ranks 41st and Gambia ranks 41st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.