Egypt vs Eswatini: Institutionalized democracy
Institutionalized democracy over time
- Egypt
- Eswatini
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 against 0 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Eswatini ahead.
Egypt ranks 41st and Eswatini ranks 41st of 51 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | 3 | 3 | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Egypt |
| 2010s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher institutionalized democracy, Egypt or Eswatini?
- Egypt, at 0 against 0 in Eswatini as of 2011.
- What is the difference in institutionalized democracy between Egypt and Eswatini?
- 0, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Eswatini?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Eswatini rank globally for institutionalized democracy?
- Egypt ranks 41st and Eswatini ranks 41st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.