Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Institutionalized democracy

Djibouti
3
in 2011
Zimbabwe
3
in 2011
Djibouti rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
27th

Institutionalized democracy over time

  • Djibouti
  • Zimbabwe
-80-60-40-200197019902011

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 3 against 3 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Djibouti ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 51 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0 -24.67 24.67 Djibouti
1980s 0 2.7 2.7 Zimbabwe
1990s 0.3 0.1 0.2 Djibouti
2000s 3 1.2 1.8 Djibouti
2010s 3 3 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher institutionalized democracy, Djibouti or Zimbabwe?
Djibouti, at 3 against 3 in Zimbabwe as of 2011.
What is the difference in institutionalized democracy between Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
0, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2011.
How do Djibouti and Zimbabwe rank globally for institutionalized democracy?
Djibouti ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid, drawing on Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/institutionalized-democracy/djibouti/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/institutionalized-democracy/djibouti/zimbabwe/">Djibouti vs Zimbabwe: Institutionalized democracy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Institutionalized democracy
Source
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 2,427 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.