Comoros vs Mauritius: Institutionalized democracy

Comoros
9
in 2011
Mauritius
10
in 2011
Comoros rank
3rd
Mauritius rank
1st

Institutionalized democracy over time

  • Comoros
  • Mauritius
-80-60-40-20020196819892011

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 10 against 9 in Comoros, a difference of 1.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.

Across all 37 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 3rd and Mauritius ranks 1st of 51 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Mauritius Difference Ahead
1970s 1 9 8 Mauritius
1980s 0 9.8 9.8 Mauritius
1990s -3.6 10 13.6 Mauritius
2000s 5.9 10 4.1 Mauritius
2010s 9 10 1 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher institutionalized democracy, Comoros or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 10 against 9 in Comoros as of 2011.
What is the difference in institutionalized democracy between Comoros and Mauritius?
1, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Mauritius?
37 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2011.
How do Comoros and Mauritius rank globally for institutionalized democracy?
Comoros ranks 3rd and Mauritius ranks 1st of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Mauritius: Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid, drawing on Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/institutionalized-democracy/comoros/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/institutionalized-democracy/comoros/mauritius/">Comoros vs Mauritius: Institutionalized democracy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Institutionalized democracy
Source
Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
51 places, 2,427 data points, 1960–2011
Last refreshed

Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.