Central African Republic vs Morocco: Institutionalized democracy
Institutionalized democracy over time
- Central African Republic
- Morocco
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Morocco, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Morocco ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 34th and Morocco ranks 34th of 51 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 | -17.3 | 17.3 | Central African Republic |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 3.5 | 0 | 3.5 | Central African Republic |
| 2000s | 2.2 | 0 | 2.2 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher institutionalized democracy, Central African Republic or Morocco?
- Central African Republic, at 1 against 1 in Morocco as of 2011.
- What is the difference in institutionalized democracy between Central African Republic and Morocco?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Morocco?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Morocco rank globally for institutionalized democracy?
- Central African Republic ranks 34th and Morocco ranks 34th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.