Cape Verde vs Comoros: Institutionalized democracy
Institutionalized democracy over time
- Cape Verde
- Comoros
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 10 against 9 in Comoros, a difference of 1.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 37 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Comoros ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 1st and Comoros ranks 3rd of 51 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2 | 1 | 1 | Cape Verde |
| 1980s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 7.4 | -3.6 | 11 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 9.8 | 5.9 | 3.9 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 10 | 9 | 1 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher institutionalized democracy, Cape Verde or Comoros?
- Cape Verde, at 10 against 9 in Comoros as of 2011.
- What is the difference in institutionalized democracy between Cape Verde and Comoros?
- 1, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Comoros?
- 37 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Comoros rank globally for institutionalized democracy?
- Cape Verde ranks 1st and Comoros ranks 3rd of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Center for Systemic Peace, www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, published as Institutionalized democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Democracy is conceived as three essential, interdependent elements. One is the presence of institutions and procedures through which citizens can express effective preferences about alternative policies and leaders. Second is the existence of institutionalized constraints on the exercise of power by the executive. Third is the guarantee of civil liberties to all citizens in their daily lives and in acts of political participation. Other aspects of plural democracy, such as the rule of law, systems of checks and balances, freedom of the press, and so on are means to, or specific manifestations of, these general principles. We do not include coded data on civil liberties.