Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$

Sao Tome and Principe
48.69
in 2014
Serbia
111.25
in 2018
Sao Tome and Principe rank
48th
Serbia rank
45th

Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$ over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Serbia
406080100120140200720122018

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 111.25 against 48.69 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 62.56.

That makes Serbia's figure about 2.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 48 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 48.24 130.55 82.31 Serbia
2010s 48.6 131.5 82.9 Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher initial household funding per secondary student, constant ppp$, Sao Tome and Principe or Serbia?
Serbia, at 111.25 against 48.69 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2018.
What is the difference in initial household funding per secondary student, constant ppp$ between Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia?
62.56, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2013.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Serbia rank globally for initial household funding per secondary student, constant ppp$?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 48th and Serbia ranks 45th of 48 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/initial-household-funding-per-secondary-student-constant-ppp/sao-tome-and-principe/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/initial-household-funding-per-secondary-student-constant-ppp/sao-tome-and-principe/serbia/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Serbia: Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
48 places, 502 data points, 1995–2019
Last refreshed

Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport) and purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes). 'Initial funding' means that government transfers to households, such as scholarships and other financial aid for education, are subtracted from what is spent by households. Note that in some countries for some education levels, the value of this indicator may be 0, since on average households may be receiving as much, or more, in financial aid from the government than what they are spending on education. Calculation: Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport), plus purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes), minus government education transfers to households (such as scholarships or other education-specific financial aid). Limitations: Indicators for household expenditure on education should be interpreted with caution since data comes from household surveys which may not all follow the same definitions and concepts. These types of surveys are also not carried out in all countries with regularity, and for some categories (such as pupils in pre-primary education), the sample sizes may be low. In some cases where data on government transfers to households (scholarships and other financial aid) was not available, they could not be subtracted from amounts paid by households. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/