Denmark vs Nepal: Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$
Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$ over time
- Denmark
- Nepal
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 498.08 against 437.35 in Nepal, a difference of 60.73.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
Denmark ranks 29th and Nepal ranks 30th of 48 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher initial household funding per secondary student, constant ppp$, Denmark or Nepal?
- Denmark, at 498.08 against 437.35 in Nepal as of 2008.
- What is the difference in initial household funding per secondary student, constant ppp$ between Denmark and Nepal?
- 60.73, with Denmark ahead.
- How do Denmark and Nepal rank globally for initial household funding per secondary student, constant ppp$?
- Denmark ranks 29th and Nepal ranks 30th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Initial household funding per secondary student, constant PPP$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport) and purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes). 'Initial funding' means that government transfers to households, such as scholarships and other financial aid for education, are subtracted from what is spent by households. Note that in some countries for some education levels, the value of this indicator may be 0, since on average households may be receiving as much, or more, in financial aid from the government than what they are spending on education. Calculation: Total payments of households (pupils, students and their families) for educational institutions (such as for tuition fees, exam and registration fees, contribution to Parent-Teacher associations or other school funds, and fees for canteen, boarding and transport), plus purchases outside of educational institutions (such as for uniforms, textbooks, teaching materials, or private classes), minus government education transfers to households (such as scholarships or other education-specific financial aid). Limitations: Indicators for household expenditure on education should be interpreted with caution since data comes from household surveys which may not all follow the same definitions and concepts. These types of surveys are also not carried out in all countries with regularity, and for some categories (such as pupils in pre-primary education), the sample sizes may be low. In some cases where data on government transfers to households (scholarships and other financial aid) was not available, they could not be subtracted from amounts paid by households. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/