Peloponnisos vs Romania: Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian)
Peloponnisos
21.5%
in 2025
Romania
18.1%
in 2025
Peloponnisos rank
3rd
Romania rank
2nd
Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian) over time
- Peloponnisos
- Romania
How they compare
Peloponnisos currently reports 21.5% against 18.1% in Romania, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Peloponnisos's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2021 it was Romania ahead.
Peloponnisos ranks 3rd and Romania ranks 2nd of 252 regions.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian), Peloponnisos or Romania?
- Peloponnisos, at 21.5% against 18.1% in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian) between Peloponnisos and Romania?
- 3.4%, with Peloponnisos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peloponnisos and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Peloponnisos and Romania rank globally for inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian)?
- Peloponnisos ranks 3rd and Romania ranks 2nd of 252 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian equivalent) every second day by NUTS 2 region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.