Malta vs Peloponnisos: Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian)
Malta
11.5
in 2025
Peloponnisos
21.5
in 2025
Malta rank
7th
Peloponnisos rank
4th
Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian) over time
- Malta
- Peloponnisos
How they compare
Peloponnisos currently reports 21.5 against 11.5 in Malta, a difference of 10.
That makes Peloponnisos's figure about 1.9 times Malta's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Peloponnisos has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 7th and Peloponnisos ranks 4th of 29 countries.
Peloponnisos has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian), Malta or Peloponnisos?
- Peloponnisos, at 21.5 against 11.5 in Malta as of 2025.
- What is the difference in inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian) between Malta and Peloponnisos?
- 10, with Peloponnisos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Peloponnisos?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2021 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Peloponnisos rank globally for inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian)?
- Malta ranks 7th and Peloponnisos ranks 4th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian equivalent) every second day by NUTS 2 region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.