Aruba vs Greenland: Ilo national vs modeled data
Aruba
8.9
in 2011
Greenland
9.1
in 2015
Aruba rank
40th
Greenland rank
37th
Ilo national vs modeled data over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 9.1 against 8.9 in Aruba, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Greenland ahead.
Aruba ranks 40th and Greenland ranks 37th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.45 | 10.08 | 2.63 | Greenland |
| 2000s | 6.91 | 10.28 | 3.37 | Greenland |
| 2010s | 9.75 | 8.6 | 1.15 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo national vs modeled data, Aruba or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 9.1 against 8.9 in Aruba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ilo national vs modeled data between Aruba and Greenland?
- 0.2, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2011.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for ilo national vs modeled data?
- Aruba ranks 40th and Greenland ranks 37th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Ilo national vs modeled data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.