Aruba vs Greenland: Unemployment rates: modeled vs. national estimates
Aruba
8.9%
in 2011
Greenland
9.1%
in 2015
Aruba rank
40th
Greenland rank
37th
Unemployment rates: modeled vs. national estimates over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 9.1% against 8.9% in Aruba, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Greenland ahead.
Aruba ranks 40th and Greenland ranks 37th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.4% | 10.1% | 2.6% | Greenland |
| 2000s | 6.9% | 10.3% | 3.4% | Greenland |
| 2010s | 9.8% | 8.6% | 1.2% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher unemployment rates: modeled vs. national estimates, Aruba or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 9.1% against 8.9% in Aruba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in unemployment rates: modeled vs. national estimates between Aruba and Greenland?
- 0.2%, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2011.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for unemployment rates: modeled vs. national estimates?
- Aruba ranks 40th and Greenland ranks 37th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Unemployment rates: modeled vs. national estimates. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Share of the labor force without work, but actively looking for a job and available to start soon. Figures refer to national estimates and may not be fully comparable across countries.