New Zealand vs Rwanda: Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled
New Zealand
5.26
in 2025
Rwanda
5.36
in 2025
New Zealand rank
94th
Rwanda rank
91st
Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled over time
- New Zealand
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 5.36 against 5.26 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1989 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 7.24 | 0.8 | 6.44 | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 8.29 | 0.4713 | 7.82 | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 5.29 | 0.895 | 4.39 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 5.19 | 6.73 | 1.54 | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 4.25 | 11.96 | 7.7 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled, New Zealand or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 5.36 against 5.26 in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled between New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 0.1, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Rwanda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Rwanda rank globally for ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled?
- New Zealand ranks 94th and Rwanda ranks 91st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ilo national vs modeled data with 551 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.