Australia vs Faroe Islands: Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled
Australia
4.2
in 2025
Faroe Islands
4.03
in 2013
Australia rank
121st
Faroe Islands rank
122nd
Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled over time
- Australia
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Australia currently reports 4.2 against 4.03 in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.17.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 121st and Faroe Islands ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.47 | 3.29 | 2.18 | Australia |
| 2010s | 5.29 | 4.68 | 0.6105 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled, Australia or Faroe Islands?
- Australia, at 4.2 against 4.03 in Faroe Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled between Australia and Faroe Islands?
- 0.17, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Faroe Islands?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2013.
- How do Australia and Faroe Islands rank globally for ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled?
- Australia ranks 121st and Faroe Islands ranks 122nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ilo national vs modeled data with 551 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.