Aruba vs Greenland: Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled
Aruba
8.9
in 2011
Greenland
9.1
in 2015
Aruba rank
40th
Greenland rank
37th
Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 9.1 against 8.9 in Aruba, a difference of 0.2.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Greenland ahead.
Aruba ranks 40th and Greenland ranks 37th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.23 | 10.9 | 3.66 | Greenland |
| 2000s | 7.17 | 8.97 | 1.8 | Greenland |
| 2010s | 9.75 | 8.6 | 1.15 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled, Aruba or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 9.1 against 8.9 in Aruba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled between Aruba and Greenland?
- 0.2, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 40th and Greenland ranks 37th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ilo national vs modeled data with 551 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.