Aruba vs Chile: Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled
Aruba
8.9
in 2011
Chile
8.89
in 2025
Aruba rank
40th
Chile rank
41st
Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Chile
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 8.9 against 8.89 in Chile, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 40th and Chile ranks 41st of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.75 | 5.97 | 0.7842 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 7.17 | 8.83 | 1.66 | Chile |
| 2010s | 9.75 | 8.02 | 1.73 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled, Aruba or Chile?
- Aruba, at 8.9 against 8.89 in Chile as of 2011.
- What is the difference in ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled between Aruba and Chile?
- 0.01, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Chile?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Aruba and Chile rank globally for ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 40th and Chile ranks 41st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ilo national vs modeled data with 551 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.