Aruba vs Bermuda: Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled
Aruba
8.9
in 2011
Bermuda
9
in 2014
Aruba rank
40th
Bermuda rank
39th
Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Bermuda
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 9 against 8.9 in Aruba, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 40th and Bermuda ranks 39th of 185 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Bermuda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.08 | 5.97 | 0.114 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 7.95 | 3.6 | 4.35 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 9.75 | 6.98 | 2.77 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled, Aruba or Bermuda?
- Bermuda, at 9 against 8.9 in Aruba as of 2014.
- What is the difference in ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled between Aruba and Bermuda?
- 0.1, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Bermuda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Aruba and Bermuda rank globally for ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 40th and Bermuda ranks 39th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Ilo national vs modeled data, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Ilo national vs modeled data with 551 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.