Cote d'Ivoire vs Rwanda: Human development index
Human development index over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.429 HDI against 0.426 HDI in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.003 HDI.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 50 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.348 HDI | 0.277 HDI | 0.071 HDI | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 1990s | 0.36 HDI | 0.233 HDI | 0.127 HDI | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2000s | 0.4093 HDI | 0.3847 HDI | 0.0247 HDI | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 0.4265 HDI | 0.427 HDI | 0.0005 HDI | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher human development index, Cote d'Ivoire or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.429 HDI against 0.426 HDI in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2011.
- What is the difference in human development index between Cote d'Ivoire and Rwanda?
- 0.003 HDI, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2011.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Rwanda rank globally for human development index?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 32nd of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/data/, published as Human development index (HDI). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary measure of human development. It measures the average achievements in a country in three basic dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent standard of living. The HDI is the geometric mean of normalized indices measuring achievements in each dimension. The HDI is the geometric mean of the three dimension indices and embodies imperfect substitutability across all HDI dimensions. It thus addresses one of the most serious criticisms of the linear aggregation formula, which allowed for perfect substitution across dimensions. Some substitutability is inherent in the definition of any index that increases with the values of its components. Data sources: Life expectancy at birth: UNDESA; Mean years of schooling: Barro and Lee; Expected years of schooling: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; Gross national income (GNI) per capita: World Bank.