Guam vs New Caledonia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Guam
0.2616 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
155th
New Caledonia rank
152nd

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • New Caledonia
00.511.5196519942023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2616 metric tons per square kilometre in Guam, a difference of 0.014 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Guam's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Guam ahead.

Guam ranks 155th and New Caledonia ranks 152nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 6 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1852 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0372 metric tons per square kilometre 0.148 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
1970s 0.2343 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0747 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1595 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
1980s 0.8291 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6268 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
1990s 1.06 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2436 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8207 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
2000s 1.17 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.864 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
2010s 0.3983 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2975 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1008 metric tons per square kilometre Guam
2020s 0.2305 metric tons per square kilometre 0.271 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0405 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Guam or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2616 metric tons per square kilometre in Guam as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Guam and New Caledonia?
0.014 metric tons per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and New Caledonia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Guam and New Caledonia rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 155th and New Caledonia ranks 152nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs New Caledonia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/guam/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/guam/new-caledonia/">Guam vs New Caledonia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.