Faroe Islands vs Tuvalu: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
650.24 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
1,633 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
3rd
Tuvalu rank
2nd

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Tuvalu
05001.0k1.5k196519942023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 1,633 metric tons per square kilometre against 650.24 metric tons per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 982.76 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 2.5 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 3rd and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 6 and Tuvalu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 119.67 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre 119.67 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 189.66 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6 metric tons per square kilometre 189.06 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 233.77 metric tons per square kilometre 20.72 metric tons per square kilometre 213.04 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 221.05 metric tons per square kilometre 19.54 metric tons per square kilometre 201.51 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 417.71 metric tons per square kilometre 82.2 metric tons per square kilometre 335.51 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 436.14 metric tons per square kilometre 345.79 metric tons per square kilometre 90.34 metric tons per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 548.77 metric tons per square kilometre 1,142 metric tons per square kilometre 592.99 metric tons per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 1,633 metric tons per square kilometre against 650.24 metric tons per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Tuvalu?
982.76 metric tons per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Tuvalu?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Tuvalu rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 3rd and Tuvalu ranks 2nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Tuvalu: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/tuvalu/">Faroe Islands vs Tuvalu: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.