Equatorial Guinea vs Zambia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.2577 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.269 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
156th
Zambia rank
153rd

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Zambia
00.10.20.3196519942023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.269 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2577 metric tons per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0113 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 156th and Zambia ranks 153rd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.072 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0549 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0171 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.1426 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0742 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.1189 metric tons per square kilometre 0.081 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0379 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.1633 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1064 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0569 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.154 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1397 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0144 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.2409 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2007 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0402 metric tons per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.2332 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2523 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0191 metric tons per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.269 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2577 metric tons per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Zambia?
0.0113 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Zambia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Zambia rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 156th and Zambia ranks 153rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Zambia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/zambia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Zambia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.