Cuba vs Zimbabwe: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Cuba
0.2528 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2563 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
158th
Zimbabwe rank
157th

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.522.5196519942023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2563 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2528 metric tons per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0035 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 215 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5513 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0052 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5461 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 1.47 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0114 metric tons per square kilometre 1.46 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 1.91 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0546 metric tons per square kilometre 1.85 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 1.12 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1577 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9586 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.6232 metric tons per square kilometre 0.226 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3972 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.4972 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3684 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1288 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.3451 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2895 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0555 metric tons per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2563 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2528 metric tons per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
0.0035 metric tons per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 158th and Zimbabwe ranks 157th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.