Cote d'Ivoire vs New Caledonia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
0.2676 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
154th
New Caledonia rank
152nd

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • New Caledonia
00.10.20.30.4196519942023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2676 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.008 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 154th and New Caledonia ranks 152nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2026 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0372 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1654 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1970s 0.2153 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0747 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1406 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 0.2732 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2022 metric tons per square kilometre 0.071 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 0.2436 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2436 metric tons per square kilometre 0 metric tons per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 0.186 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3098 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1238 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.2644 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2975 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0331 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.2459 metric tons per square kilometre 0.271 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0251 metric tons per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.2756 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.2676 metric tons per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and New Caledonia?
0.008 metric tons per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and New Caledonia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and New Caledonia rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 154th and New Caledonia ranks 152nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs New Caledonia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/new-caledonia/">Cote d'Ivoire vs New Caledonia: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.