Chile vs Sao Tome and Principe: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Chile
5.52 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
5.88 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
41st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
39th

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Sao Tome and Principe
02.557.51012.5196519942023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 5.88 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.52 metric tons per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.36 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.54 metric tons per square kilometre 0.875 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6652 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1970s 1.87 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9196 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9549 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1980s 6.28 metric tons per square kilometre 3.31 metric tons per square kilometre 2.98 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
1990s 8.52 metric tons per square kilometre 3.7 metric tons per square kilometre 4.82 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
2000s 6.8 metric tons per square kilometre 4.33 metric tons per square kilometre 2.46 metric tons per square kilometre Chile
2010s 4.91 metric tons per square kilometre 8.55 metric tons per square kilometre 3.63 metric tons per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 5.33 metric tons per square kilometre 5.77 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4374 metric tons per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Chile or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 5.88 metric tons per square kilometre against 5.52 metric tons per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Chile and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.36 metric tons per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sao Tome and Principe?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sao Tome and Principe: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/chile/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/chile/sao-tome-and-principe/">Chile vs Sao Tome and Principe: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.