Aruba vs Greenland: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.9528 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Greenland
0.968 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
99th
Greenland rank
98th

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Greenland
01234196519942023

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.968 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9528 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0152 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 99th and Greenland ranks 98th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 5 and Greenland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Greenland Difference Ahead
1960s 2 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1742 metric tons per square kilometre 1.83 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 3.19 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4226 metric tons per square kilometre 2.77 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 3.87 metric tons per square kilometre 0.5381 metric tons per square kilometre 3.33 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre 0.713 metric tons per square kilometre 0.6492 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 0.8839 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9243 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0405 metric tons per square kilometre Greenland
2010s 0.8444 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9449 metric tons per square kilometre 0.1004 metric tons per square kilometre Greenland
2020s 0.9347 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9284 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0063 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Aruba or Greenland?
Greenland, at 0.968 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.9528 metric tons per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Aruba and Greenland?
0.0152 metric tons per square kilometre, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 99th and Greenland ranks 98th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Greenland: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/aruba/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/aruba/greenland/">Aruba vs Greenland: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.