Aruba vs Costa Rica: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.9528 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.8949 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
99th
Costa Rica rank
102nd

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Costa Rica
01234196519942023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.9528 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.8949 metric tons per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0579 metric tons per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 99th and Costa Rica ranks 102nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 6 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 2 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0756 metric tons per square kilometre 1.92 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 3.19 metric tons per square kilometre 0.2905 metric tons per square kilometre 2.9 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 3.87 metric tons per square kilometre 0.3294 metric tons per square kilometre 3.54 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre 0.4993 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8629 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 0.8839 metric tons per square kilometre 0.8977 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0139 metric tons per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 0.8444 metric tons per square kilometre 0.7859 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0586 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 0.9347 metric tons per square kilometre 0.9107 metric tons per square kilometre 0.0241 metric tons per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Aruba or Costa Rica?
Aruba, at 0.9528 metric tons per square kilometre against 0.8949 metric tons per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Aruba and Costa Rica?
0.0579 metric tons per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Costa Rica?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Costa Rica rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 99th and Costa Rica ranks 102nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Costa Rica: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/aruba/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/aruba/costa-rica/">Aruba vs Costa Rica: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.