Antigua and Barbuda vs North Korea: How have things changed?, per square kilometre

Antigua and Barbuda
7.47 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
North Korea
7.42 metric tons per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
29th
North Korea rank
32nd

How have things changed?, per square kilometre over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • North Korea
051015196519942023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 7.47 metric tons per square kilometre against 7.42 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea, a difference of 0.05 metric tons per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was North Korea ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 29th and North Korea ranks 32nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and North Korea in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda North Korea Difference Ahead
1960s 1.82 metric tons per square kilometre 3.79 metric tons per square kilometre 1.97 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1970s 3.17 metric tons per square kilometre 6.35 metric tons per square kilometre 3.18 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1980s 3.43 metric tons per square kilometre 13.16 metric tons per square kilometre 9.74 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
1990s 3.22 metric tons per square kilometre 9.24 metric tons per square kilometre 6.02 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2000s 5.86 metric tons per square kilometre 5.9 metric tons per square kilometre 0.042 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea
2010s 7.94 metric tons per square kilometre 6.58 metric tons per square kilometre 1.36 metric tons per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 7.33 metric tons per square kilometre 7.41 metric tons per square kilometre 0.084 metric tons per square kilometre North Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per square kilometre, Antigua and Barbuda or North Korea?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 7.47 metric tons per square kilometre against 7.42 metric tons per square kilometre in North Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per square kilometre between Antigua and Barbuda and North Korea?
0.05 metric tons per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and North Korea?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and North Korea rank globally for how have things changed?, per square kilometre?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 29th and North Korea ranks 32nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs North Korea: How have things changed?, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Antigua and Barbuda vs North Korea: How have things changed?, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per square kilometre
Unit
metric tons per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,549 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.