Hong Kong vs Uganda: How have things changed?, per capita

Hong Kong
0.0126 metric tons per person
in 2024
Uganda
0.0128 metric tons per person
in 2024
Hong Kong rank
95th
Uganda rank
92nd

How have things changed?, per capita over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Uganda
0.010.020.030.04196519942024

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.0128 metric tons per person against 0.0126 metric tons per person in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0002 metric tons per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 95th and Uganda ranks 92nd of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0229 metric tons per person 0.0104 metric tons per person 0.0125 metric tons per person Hong Kong
1970s 0.0339 metric tons per person 0.0148 metric tons per person 0.019 metric tons per person Hong Kong
1980s 0.0381 metric tons per person 0.0125 metric tons per person 0.0256 metric tons per person Hong Kong
1990s 0.0337 metric tons per person 0.0111 metric tons per person 0.0226 metric tons per person Hong Kong
2000s 0.0244 metric tons per person 0.0126 metric tons per person 0.0117 metric tons per person Hong Kong
2010s 0.0211 metric tons per person 0.0145 metric tons per person 0.0066 metric tons per person Hong Kong
2020s 0.0136 metric tons per person 0.0149 metric tons per person 0.0013 metric tons per person Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per capita, Hong Kong or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.0128 metric tons per person against 0.0126 metric tons per person in Hong Kong as of 2024.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per capita between Hong Kong and Uganda?
0.0002 metric tons per person, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uganda?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong and Uganda rank globally for how have things changed?, per capita?
Hong Kong ranks 95th and Uganda ranks 92nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Uganda: How have things changed?, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/uganda/">Hong Kong vs Uganda: How have things changed?, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,930 data points, 1965–2024
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.