Ecuador vs Namibia: How have things changed?, per capita

Ecuador
0.1114 metric tons per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.1259 metric tons per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
20th
Namibia rank
17th

How have things changed?, per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Namibia
00.20.40.6196519942024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1259 metric tons per person against 0.1114 metric tons per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0145 metric tons per person.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 17th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0104 metric tons per person 0.0057 metric tons per person 0.0047 metric tons per person Ecuador
1970s 0.0377 metric tons per person 0.0086 metric tons per person 0.029 metric tons per person Ecuador
1980s 0.0798 metric tons per person 0.0154 metric tons per person 0.0644 metric tons per person Ecuador
1990s 0.0444 metric tons per person 0.3546 metric tons per person 0.3101 metric tons per person Namibia
2000s 0.0428 metric tons per person 0.2926 metric tons per person 0.2498 metric tons per person Namibia
2010s 0.0614 metric tons per person 0.2143 metric tons per person 0.1529 metric tons per person Namibia
2020s 0.1002 metric tons per person 0.1236 metric tons per person 0.0234 metric tons per person Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per capita, Ecuador or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.1259 metric tons per person against 0.1114 metric tons per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per capita between Ecuador and Namibia?
0.0145 metric tons per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Namibia?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Namibia rank globally for how have things changed?, per capita?
Ecuador ranks 20th and Namibia ranks 17th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Namibia: How have things changed?, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-capita/ecuador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-capita/ecuador/namibia/">Ecuador vs Namibia: How have things changed?, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,930 data points, 1965–2024
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.