Curacao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: How have things changed?, per capita

Curacao
0.0157 metric tons per person
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0145 metric tons per person
in 2024
Curacao rank
83rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
86th

How have things changed?, per capita over time

  • Curacao
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.511.52196519942024

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 0.0157 metric tons per person against 0.0145 metric tons per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0012 metric tons per person.

That makes Curacao's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Curacao ranks 83rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 86th of 215 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1894 metric tons per person 0.9201 metric tons per person 0.7306 metric tons per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.0798 metric tons per person 0.0144 metric tons per person 0.0654 metric tons per person Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher how have things changed?, per capita, Curacao or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Curacao, at 0.0157 metric tons per person against 0.0145 metric tons per person in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in how have things changed?, per capita between Curacao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0012 metric tons per person, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Curacao and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for how have things changed?, per capita?
Curacao ranks 83rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 86th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as How have things changed?, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: How have things changed?, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-capita/curacao/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/how-have-things-changed-per-capita/curacao/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Curacao vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: How have things changed?, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
How have things changed?, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 11,930 data points, 1965–2024
Last refreshed

How have things changed? divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.