Australia vs Mauritius: Health workers, as a share of public total employees
Australia
0.2614
in 2015
Mauritius
0.1916
in 2012
Australia rank
1st
Mauritius rank
4th
Health workers, as a share of public total employees over time
- Australia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.2614 against 0.1916 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0698.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.4 times Mauritius's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 4th of 29 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2792 | 0.1686 | 0.1105 | Australia |
| 2010s | 0.2592 | 0.1917 | 0.0675 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher health workers, as a share of public total employees, Australia or Mauritius?
- Australia, at 0.2614 against 0.1916 in Mauritius as of 2015.
- What is the difference in health workers, as a share of public total employees between Australia and Mauritius?
- 0.0698, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2012.
- How do Australia and Mauritius rank globally for health workers, as a share of public total employees?
- Australia ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 4th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Health workers, as a share of public total employees. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.