Netherlands vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - quarterly data

Netherlands
118.64
in 2026
Serbia
119.56
in 2026
Netherlands rank
14th
Serbia rank
11th

Gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - quarterly data over time

  • Netherlands
  • Serbia
050100150199520102026

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 119.56 against 118.64 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.92.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 11th of 37 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 3 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Serbia Difference Ahead
1990s 72.4 32.61 39.79 Netherlands
2000s 86.58 62.37 24.21 Netherlands
2010s 87.7 83.09 4.62 Netherlands
2020s 108.35 141.66 33.32 Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - quarterly data, Netherlands or Serbia?
Serbia, at 119.56 against 118.64 in Netherlands as of 2026.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - quarterly data between Netherlands and Serbia?
0.92, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Serbia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2026.
How do Netherlands and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - quarterly data?
Netherlands ranks 14th and Serbia ranks 11th of 37 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - quarterly data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation by main asset type - quarterly data
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
42 places, 1,340 data points, 1978–2026
Last refreshed