Liechtenstein vs Macau, China: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
Liechtenstein
103.3%
in 2018
Macau, China
102.8%
in 2019
Liechtenstein rank
70th
Macau, China rank
72nd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Liechtenstein
- Macau, China
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 103.3% against 102.8% in Macau, China, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Liechtenstein ahead.
Liechtenstein ranks 70th and Macau, China ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Macau, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 103.9% | 101.2% | 2.7% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 103.1% | 101.1% | 2.0% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, Liechtenstein or Macau, China?
- Liechtenstein, at 103.3% against 102.8% in Macau, China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between Liechtenstein and Macau, China?
- 0.5%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Macau, China?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Liechtenstein and Macau, China rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- Liechtenstein ranks 70th and Macau, China ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.