Hong Kong, China vs Middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Middle income
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 109.4% against 96.7% in Middle income, a difference of 12.7%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Middle income's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 27th and Middle income ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96.9% | 90.1% | 6.8% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 107.3% | 97.5% | 9.8% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, Hong Kong, China or Middle income?
- Hong Kong, China, at 109.4% against 96.7% in Middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between Hong Kong, China and Middle income?
- 12.7%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Middle income?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 27th and Middle income ranks 25th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.