Arab World vs Hong Kong, China: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Arab World
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 109.4% against 92.8% in Arab World, a difference of 16.6%.
That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times Arab World's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Arab World ranks 32nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 27th of 45 groups.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Arab World | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 81.5% | 96.9% | 15.4% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 92.3% | 107.3% | 15.0% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, Arab World or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 109.4% against 92.8% in Arab World as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between Arab World and Hong Kong, China?
- 16.6%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Arab World and Hong Kong, China?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Arab World and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- Arab World ranks 32nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 27th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.