Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs San Marino: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
19.1%
in 2019
San Marino
38.5%
in 2019
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
20th
San Marino rank
23rd

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time

  • Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • San Marino
010203040199720082019

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 38.5% against 19.1% in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 19.4%.

That makes San Marino's figure about 2.0 times Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 20th and San Marino ranks 23rd of 34 groups.

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) San Marino Difference Ahead
2000s 17.6% 0.0% 17.6% Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)
2010s 20.0% 18.7% 1.3% Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) or San Marino?
San Marino, at 38.5% against 19.1% in Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and San Marino?
19.4%, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and San Marino?
5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
How do Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) and San Marino rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 20th and San Marino ranks 23rd of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs San Marino: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-male-percent/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-ida-and-ibrd-countries/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-male-percent/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-ida-and-ibrd-countries/san-marino/">Latin America & the Caribbean (IDA & IBRD countries) vs San Marino: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,961 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.