El Salvador vs Qatar: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
El Salvador
7.2%
in 2018
Qatar
7.2%
in 2019
El Salvador rank
49th
Qatar rank
50th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- El Salvador
- Qatar
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 7.2% against 7.2% in Qatar, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Qatar ahead.
El Salvador ranks 49th and Qatar ranks 50th of 174 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 7.1% | 3.9% | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, El Salvador or Qatar?
- El Salvador, at 7.2% against 7.2% in Qatar as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between El Salvador and Qatar?
- 0.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Qatar?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Qatar rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- El Salvador ranks 49th and Qatar ranks 50th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.