Congo vs Panama: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Congo
0.0%
in 2012
Panama
1.4%
in 2017
Congo rank
68th
Panama rank
65th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Congo
  • Panama
00.511.5199920082017

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1.4% against 0.0% in Congo, a difference of 1.4%.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 68th and Panama ranks 65th of 174 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Congo or Panama?
Panama, at 1.4% against 0.0% in Congo as of 2017.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Congo and Panama?
1.4%, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Panama?
14 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
How do Congo and Panama rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Congo ranks 68th and Panama ranks 65th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,961 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.