Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Rwanda: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.6% against 0.0% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 68th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 174 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0.6% against 0.0% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Rwanda?
- 0.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Rwanda?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Rwanda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 68th and Rwanda ranks 66th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.