Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Panama: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1.4% against 0.0% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 1.4%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 68th and Panama ranks 65th of 174 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Panama?
- Panama, at 1.4% against 0.0% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Panama?
- 1.4%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Panama?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2015.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Panama rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 68th and Panama ranks 65th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.