China (People’s Republic of) vs Mongolia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Mongolia
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 68th and Mongolia ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China (People’s Republic of) | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 14.6% | 14.6% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, China (People’s Republic of) or Mongolia?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between China (People’s Republic of) and Mongolia?
- 0.0%, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Mongolia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Mongolia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 68th and Mongolia ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.