Rwanda vs Seychelles: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Rwanda
0.6%
in 2019
Seychelles
0.0%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
66th
Seychelles rank
68th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Rwanda
- Seychelles
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.6% against 0.0% in Seychelles, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Seychelles ahead.
Rwanda ranks 66th and Seychelles ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Rwanda or Seychelles?
- Rwanda, at 0.6% against 0.0% in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Rwanda and Seychelles?
- 0.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Seychelles?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Seychelles rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Rwanda ranks 66th and Seychelles ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.