Israel vs Middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Israel
- Middle income
How they compare
Israel currently reports 60.9% against 24.0% in Middle income, a difference of 36.9%.
That makes Israel's figure about 2.5 times Middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Middle income ahead.
Israel ranks 8th and Middle income ranks 9th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Middle income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 11.2% | 11.2% | Middle income |
| 2010s | 30.3% | 17.8% | 12.5% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Israel or Middle income?
- Israel, at 60.9% against 24.0% in Middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Israel and Middle income?
- 36.9%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Middle income?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Israel and Middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Israel ranks 8th and Middle income ranks 9th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.