Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 44.0% against 20.7% in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 23.3%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.1 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Latvia ranks 17th of 34 groups.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 44.0% against 20.7% in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Latvia?
- 23.3%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
- How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 15th and Latvia ranks 17th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.