Estonia vs IDA only: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Estonia
- IDA only
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 30.4% against 8.9% in IDA only, a difference of 21.5%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 3.4 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was IDA only ahead.
Estonia ranks 28th and IDA only ranks 25th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and IDA only in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | IDA only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 6.9% | 6.9% | IDA only |
| 2010s | 18.0% | 9.9% | 8.1% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Estonia or IDA only?
- Estonia, at 30.4% against 8.9% in IDA only as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Estonia and IDA only?
- 21.5%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and IDA only?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Estonia and IDA only rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Estonia ranks 28th and IDA only ranks 25th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.