Congo vs Uganda: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Congo
0.0%
in 2012
Uganda
0.0%
in 2017
Congo rank
68th
Uganda rank
68th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Congo
  • Uganda
00.20.40.60.81199820072017

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 68th and Uganda ranks 68th of 174 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Congo or Uganda?
Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda as of 2012.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Congo and Uganda?
0.0%, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Uganda?
13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2012.
How do Congo and Uganda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Congo ranks 68th and Uganda ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,961 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.